When Should You Upgrade Your Kit?

When Should You Upgrade Your Kit?

Now and again, we all get the desire to buy new kit; it’s only to be expected with the way new tech is marketed, combined with our desire to improve our craft. Do you need that new piece of equipment? Is it time to jump from a cropped sensor to a full frame? Should you move from DSLR to mirrorless? Will it improve your photography? 
I’ll start with the cliché that we’re all familiar with: the best camera at any given moment is the one in your hand. Photography equipment is expensive; all of us (and our partners) can attest to that. Prices seem to be going up with every new generation of technology. Unless money is genuinely no object or your primary income is directly reliant on the quality of your equipment, it’s probably safe to say that your current equipment is, at the very least, adequate. Anyone outside the photographic community who isn’t involved in the sale and marketing of camera equipment will likely question a hobbyist spending several thousand dollars on a new camera body, but we do, quite regularly.

My Struggles With Gear Acquisition Syndrome 

When I started, a more experienced photographer told me that I should only be looking to upgrade when I had outgrown the kit I was using, whether that be through the need for more advanced features or the advent of new technology that fundamentally changed the way I work. My first DSLR was a Canon Rebel T2i (550D in Europe) with the standard 18-55mm kit len. This entry-level DSLR was a fantastic first DSLR. It wasn’t at all intimidating, and it allowed me to learn all the basics like how white balance, shutter speed, ISO, and aperture alter exposure and the differences they make to the image. I then bought the mandatory nifty fifty 50mm f/1.8 so that I could start playing with shallow depth of field. That was it; I was hooked. I quickly became a regular at the local camera shop and would chat away with the staff and play with the new kit when it came in. It wasn’t long before I desired the Canon 7D, that “pro body” with an extra dial on the back, faster burst mode, and a bigger buffer (neither of which I used). Looking back now, I think that was an illogical upgrade. The 7D used the same sensor as the T2i, so I paid a large sum of money for better ergonomics and a slightly improved autofocus system. That aside, I started doing professional photography work with that 7D, and it was a great camera to use. But there’s always a better camera and shiny new lenses.

I quickly fell into the trap of looking at DxOMark and pixel-peeping reviews that were telling me how much better a new camera or new lens is than my existing kit. I’ve since learned that a lot of these factors don’t make any real noticeable difference to the photos produced and are mostly academic. 

To keep resale values as high as possible, I’ve always looked after my equipment and kept all the original boxes, manuals, and cables. I’d recommend any new photographer get in the habit of doing the same. As a result, I’ve been able to sell or trade kits that I’ve outgrown. Over the next few years, I bought, traded, and swapped lenses and camera bodies until I was using the Canon 5D Mark III with the trusty 7D as a backup, and I had the set of L series lenses that I wanted — the usual holy trinity of zoom lenses as well as some prime lenses to cover a wide range of focal lengths and uses. Jumping from a cropped sensor camera to a full frame camera was incredible; the low-light capability and the beautifully shallow depth of field were noticeable and significant upgrades. It’s safe to say at this point, I was happy with my setup. I didn’t desire any new kit. Yet. 

It was around this time that Sony was making waves with their mirrorless cameras, and I had started to dabble with video, so I started to desire the Sony a7S II. I saved money, sold the 7D, and purchased a Sony a7S II, alongside an EF mount adaptor and a couple of Sony primes. The image quality was excellent; the video was much better than the Canon bodies. Using the Sony a7S II, I learned a lot about video and color grading. Initially, I didn’t like the ergonomics, I didn’t like how the Sony body felt in my hands, I didn’t find it as intuitive to use, autofocus wasn’t great, and the battery life was pretty terrible by comparison. I gave it almost a year to give myself time to get used to the Sony system, and I found it just wasn’t for me. I loved the images and video that came from the camera, but I didn’t like using it as much as the Canon bodies. Canon had recently released the 5D Mark IV, and I wasn’t doing as much video work as anticipated, so in 2016, I traded in the Sony body and lenses for a brand new Canon 5D Mark IV. I’d researched it, and it was a significant enough upgrade for me to be excited by this new camera. I’m very aware that my experience with the Sony a7S II put me off looking into mirrorless cameras again for quite some time.

Older, Wiser, and Happy With My Kit

As I’ve gained more experience in photography and become very comfortable using the 5D Mark IV, I haven’t been tempted by any new and shiny cameras. I often remind myself of the advice I was given years earlier about only upgrading when I have outgrown the kit I currently use. I don’t feel that I am regularly pushing the limits of my equipment. I also remember how excited I was when I first got the 5D Mark IV, how impressed I was at the low-light ability and lightning-fast and accurate autofocus. 

As time goes by and new technology is developed, the camera I use is still the same as when it was the new and best (in my opinion) camera available. New cameras don’t mean that my camera takes worse photos or is any less capable, just that new cameras bring new features, some of which will be useful to you and your photography.

Do You Need to Upgrade?

If you’re starting to desire new equipment, my advice would be to consider whether you have yet outgrown your existing equipment or you just want new toys. Carefully consider your purchases. Is that new lens really going to get used or just fill an empty slot in your kit bag? Do you need the features of that new camera body, or would your money be better spent on a photography trip or some photography tuition?

If you’ve decided that you are going to upgrade, my advice would be to look at real-world reviews rather than looking at lab tests and lens charts. Make sure that the equipment you’re purchasing will do what you need in the way that you expect. 

Finally, keep the box, manuals, and cables in good condition for the next time you desire new equipment. Even if the resale value isn’t much higher, you’ll have an easier time selling something that looks cared for.

Is My Kit Good Enough?

In researching for this article, I looked into a wide range of modern cameras, new technology, and the improvements over older DSLRs. I had no desire to upgrade my kit; I was very happy with my DSLR bodies and lenses. I can work professionally and competently to produce the images I need to produce. By my advice, I didn’t think I had outgrown my existing camera. 

This week, I was shooting some portraits, my workflow and shooting style were the same as ever. Occasionally, I missed critical focus. It happens when shooting a very shallow depth of field; a tiny movement from the subject can result in slightly missed focus. No drama, just take it again.

Then, in the same week, I was shooting a group of dancers and there were one or two images where the focus wasn’t exactly where I wanted it. It was a shame, but I had more than enough images that I was happy with. I also filled the buffer once or twice when shooting quickly. It happens. I simply wait a few seconds, then start shooting again.

So, I keep telling myself that an image that is slightly out of focus is just something that happens when shooting moving subjects, or the camera focusing on an eyelash instead of the eye is just something that happens with AF points at close range and shallow focus. But that shiny new Canon R5 I was looking into has amazing face detection and eye detection technology, and it also has faster write speeds and a larger buffer. I wouldn’t have discarded as many images if I had a new mirrorless camera.

My current camera indeed takes images as well today as the day I bought it, and it’s also true that new technologies have overcome some limitations that we, as photographers, have just learned to live with. It seems to me that this new generation of mirrorless cameras isn’t quite the same jump as film to digital, more similar to the subtle but significant upgrade from an old cropped sensor to a new full frame sensor.

My intention with this article was to advise you to make informed decisions and carefully consider any purchases based on your own needs. In researching the subject, I have found that maybe now is the right time for me to upgrade after all.

When do you upgrade your equipment? Have you made a significant jump in technology recently?
Let me know your thoughts in the comments.

Brad Wendes's picture

Brad Wendes is a British photographer and travel lover.
He began photographing parkour and acrobatics in 2010 and has since taken to portraiture and fitness photography.
Brad is a self-confessed geek, Star Wars fan, tech enthusiast, cat lover and recently converted Apple Fanboy.

Log in or register to post comments

Just upgraded my equipment after 10 years with 5D Mark II now I am using an EOS R... Just felt it esse time for an upgrade... But thought a lot before The investment... :)

How are you finding the switch from DSLR to mirrorless?

I upgraded from the T3i after definitely outgrowing it to the 7D. I found the ergonomics and autofocus and 11fps was a game changer for wildlife photography (although I do more than just that). Then upgraded from the 7D to the 5Div which was a major shift to full frame. Last year I pre-ordered the R5 and was lucky enough to get mine early on. The R5 and RF glass is a major jump from the 5Div. I don’t regret a single one of those jumps. I have been able to maintain my existing investment in Canon lenses throughout and am very happy that I resisted the temptation to jump over to Sony and trusted that Canon would get there - which they certainly have! Good advice in this article!

Thank you. Have you tried using adapted EF lenses on the R5 or did you switch straight to RF lenses? The additional cost of trading lenses might be a barrier to some. If adapted EF lenses work as promised, that’s a great move from Canon to get people to upgrade gradually

Upgraded too often in the past (I'm a Canon shooter): 350D -> 60D -> 6D was enough for years, grew old and had to be replaced. I chose the 6Dii, just a month too early. A year later I sold it, went to the EOS R, where I will stay until ... until Canon offers a EOS R6ii or so with all the good stuff it already has + Eye-Control-AF (hopefully applicable also in manual focusing for in-viewer-magnification of the focus spot). The EOS R has no focus joystick, but I'd rather go for Eye-Control-AF, as this should be the way to set the focus point precisely and quickly. Now I lose time with control ring, and using the touchscreen doesn't help as my nose (left-eye shooter) nearly always touches the screen.

You raise an interesting point. As a Canon shooter I agree there was a lot of choice over the last 10 years or so, now there’s a little less choice and a very expensive jump from a 5D / 6D to an R5/R6.
I may also wait for the R5ii or R6ii and decide whether to get a cheaper R5 or a newer mkii

When we have money to buy one with cash :-)

Agreed, no-one should be getting into debt for new toys. Investment in a photography business is another conversation, but I’d agree that a hobbyist should only buy what they can afford.

I think I have updated more rapidly in recent years but I think I will be slowing down now. Partly it was because I was buying the camera I could afford at the time, but not the camera I actually wanted or needed for situations I was experiencing. I was buying cameras that were a couple of generations old, and quickly reaching a ceiling for what I wanted from the images.

Now I recently got a Sony A7R IV and I dont see myself needing to move on from that for a while.

Started with a Galaxy Camera and got gifted a Nikon D3200. Image quality was fine for me but I upgraded to the D5600 for better autofocus, improved ISO, flip screen, and access to the new AF-P lens line up. After that I got a D750 to once again have better AF but primarily to gain access to the FF lens line up and get improved ISO performance because I did a lot of low light. Later purchased a Panasonic Lumix GX85 and G7 while on sale Black Friday because I wanted to mess around with M43 and get access to 4k video. I need a better telephoto lens for wild life, other wise I just buy old cheap lenses to mess around with. Probably won't invest into a new camera body for a few more years.

I've been using a Nikon D3400 for the past two years. Desperately need an upgrade but I'm not sure if I should stay with Nikon or try a new brand? I am fascinated by Leica but I'm also interested in Fuji and Sony. Not sure what to do.

Leica might be a pricey jump! Could be worth hiring some kit from various brands to see what works for you?

Yeah Leica is quite expensive. Definitely a dream camera to own for now. I did come across Borrowlenses the other night. Might give them a try.

I upgrade when there are limitations.

Canon D60 in 2002. Canon 1D Mark II in 2004 because 3 AF points and 'high ISO' noise (at ISO 200) was seriously limiting. That was the shortest period between upgrades. Then a 5D Mark III in 2012 for better low-light capabilities, and a 5D Mark IV in 2019 when the USB port in the 5DIII died and it would have cost more than $1200 to fix. In hindsight, another 5DIII might have been a wiser choice, but I couldn't resist.

In terms of time for digital: 2 years, 8 years, 7 years, and pending. Prior to digital, it was probably 10+ years between upgrades, as repairs and maintenance were more practical, and the hardware improvements weren't as rapid.

Eye autofocus is enticing, and better high ISO is a plus, but neither is compelling for me. Maybe a global shutter for no sync speed limits might make a difference? Otherwise, I might pick up a usedR5/R6 after the Mark II or III versions come out, but if I could still tether with my 2012 5RIII, I'd be happy to continue using it.

I’ve been using a t1i since 2009. Sometimes feels like I’m waaay behind as far as tech, but I feel like I get great images out of it. Still, I’m tempted to go mirrorless and try all the new tech features that I’ve been missing out on.

Thanks for the tips!

I managed to resist GAS until a big event comes up. When I started photography in 1968 it was with a Miranda Sensorex 50mm f/1.8. Looking back I took some of the best photos technically with that camera. I guess it was because every shot cost money and we were as poor as church mice. Then in the early 80’s, I had a good paying job, and my Miranda was showing its age. Photos were extremely important to my wife and she insisted that I upgrade my camera. I bought a Canon AE1 Program. Of all the cameras I’ve owned, I loved that one the best. It had the 50mm f/1.8 lens and it worked well until digital came out. In 2005 or so, I sprung for the Canon Digital Rebel. I hated that camera. It felt like a toy and I was never happy with the quality of the photos. But I kept it until our once in a lifetime trip to Alaska. Again t my wife insisted I upgrade. I purchased a Canon 8D. I think it is an awesome piece of gear, but I just can’t seem to make it shine. I know it’s me, not the gear. Photos tend to be unsharp and off exposure. I compensate by taking more photos than necessary hoping one comes out right. Part of it’s probably age. I’m 70 years old now and I don’t see as well as I did in 1968 when I was 16. But sometimes I yearn for a split image rangefinder or a fresnel focusing screen like my old Miranda had. But alas, that ship has sailed. The 80D is likely my last camera. Hopefully, my granddaughter takes up the craft and it will shine in her hands when I’m gone.